Governor Brewer lost her Federal suit to stop Prop 203, and she had decided not to appeal.  In turn, this has prompted DHS to lift its moratorium on accepting dispensary applications.  

 Per DHS Director, Will Humble’s blog, DHS is expecting to start accepting dispensary applications in April.  However, due to a significant victory in the Compassion First v. Arizona case, the application qualifications and rules that DHS published last year are going to change significantly.  Per Director Humble, DHS is working at fever pace to amend the regulations to conform to the Superior Court ruling. 

 Amongst the changes coming to the dispensary application process include: 

  • Removal of the 3 year Arizona residency requirement;
  • Removal of the requirement that an applicant never filed for bankruptcy (personal or corporate);
  • Removal of the requirement that the applicant have submitted their past 3 year Arizona tax returns;
  • Removal of the requirement that the applicant be current on child support.

 You can read Director Humble’s blog here.  The blog also has a link to the Compassion First v. Arizona decision. 

 As a result of the Compassion First v. Arizona decision, there are two issues of which you need to be aware.  First, we don’t know if any of the parties to the Compassion First v. Arizona case intend to appeal.  If they do, it may result in a further delay to DHS accepting applications and/or may result in post-application lawsuits pitting the non-winners of dispensary certificates against the winners and DHS.  Second, the removal of the residency requirements means no hometown advantage and a probable influx of out-of-state players vying for dispensaries.  This may also result in DHS abolishing or altering its plans to hold a lottery to award certificates in CHAAS that produce multiple qualified applicants.

Smith & Craven is keeping its finger on the pulse of these issues and remains available to assist you and your referrals with all stages of the application process, including real estate, zoning, corporate formality, and regulatory compliance.  We also provide litigation services, appeals, and can provide on-going legal counseling for dispensaries and their owners.

{ 0 comments }

Smith & Craven is proud to announce that founding partner, Gary Michael Smith, was today awarded an AV rating by Martindale Hubbell.

 

WHAT ARE MARTINDALE-HUBBELL® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™?
The Martindale-Hubbell® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™ are an objective indicator of a lawyer’s high ethical standards and professional ability, generated from evaluations of lawyers by other members of the bar and the judiciary in the United States and Canada. The first review to establish a lawyer’s rating usually occurs three years after his/her first admission to the bar.

LexisNexis facilitates secure online Martindale-Hubbell® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™ surveys of lawyers across multiple jurisdictions and geographic locations, in similar areas of practice as the lawyer being rated. Reviewers are asked to assess their colleagues’ general ethical standards and legal ability in a specific area of practice. The ratings appear in all formats of the Martindale-Hubbell® Law Directory, in the online listings on martindale.com, Lawyers.comSM, on the LexisNexis services, on LN mobile apps. Your Martindale-Hubbell® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™ can also be displayed on your LinkedIn® profile via the LinkedIn® Lawyers Ratings Application.
 
The Ratings Explanation
Martindale-Hubbell® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™ reflect a combination of achieving a Very High General Ethical Standards rating and a Legal Ability numerical rating. A threshold number of responses is required to achieve a rating.
The General Ethical Standards rating denotes adherence to professional standards of conduct and ethics, reliability, diligence and other criteria relevant to the discharge of professional responsibilities. Those lawyers who meet the “Very High” criteria of General Ethical Standards can proceed to the next step in the ratings process – Legal Ability.
Legal Ability ratings are based on performance in five key areas, rated on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). These areas are:

  • Legal Knowledge – Lawyer’s familiarity with the laws governing his/her specific area of practice(s)
  • Analytical Capabilities – Lawyer’s creativity in analyzing legal issues and applying technical knowledge
  • Judgment – Lawyer’s demonstration of the salient factors that drive the outcome of a given case or issue.
  • Communication Ability – Lawyer’s capability to communicate persuasively and credibly
  • Legal Experience – Lawyer’s degree of experience in his/her specific area of practice(s)
The numeric ratings range may coincide with the appropriate Certification Mark:

  • AV Preeminent (4.5-5.0)- AV Preeminent is a significant rating accomplishment – a testament to the fact that a lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence.
  • BV Distinguished (3.0-4.4) – BV Distinguished is an excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. A widely respected mark of achievement, it differentiates a lawyer from his or her competition.
  • Rated (1.0-2.9) – The Peer Review Rated designation demonstrates that the lawyer has met the very high criteria of General Ethical Standing.

{ 0 comments }

Smith & Craven Featured in “Attorney At Law Magazine”

November 2, 2011

Smith & Craven were honored to be featured in the August 2011 issue of Attorney at Law Magazine.   To read the article, click HERE.

Read the full article →

Arizona Law Prohibits the Lending of a Contractor’s License

July 20, 2011

Last October’s hail storms in the Phoenix Metro area resulted in an influx of out-of-state contractors soliciting work and using the licenses of Arizona roofing contractors. A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(10) provides that the following conduct is unlawful: “[a]iding or abetting a licensed or unlicensed person to evade this chapter, knowingly or recklessly combining or conspiring with [...]

Read the full article →

Recall Petition RC-04-2011 Has Enough Valid Signatures

July 20, 2011

Secretary of State Ken Bennett notified Governor Jan Brewer of his determination that recall petition serial number RC-04-2011, filed by the Citizens for a Better Arizona Committee, exceeds the number of minimum signatures required by the Arizona Constitution to be placed on the ballot at the next consolidated election date that is 90 days or [...]

Read the full article →

Beware Contractors Acting As Unlicensed Insurance Adjusters

July 20, 2011

Arizona insurance law requires any person who “adjusts, investigates or negotiates settlement of claims” to have a license from the Arizona Department of Insurance.  It is not unusual for a property owner’s contractor to discuss the details of building damage with the insurance company’s adjuster, particularly when there is extensive or complex damage.  Often the [...]

Read the full article →

Medicinal Marijuana Law Update

July 20, 2011

Although Prop 203 passed and ADHS was set to accept dispensary applications in June 2011,  on 27 May 2011, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer directed Attorney General Tom Horne to file a Federal lawsuit seeking declaratory relief adjudging Prop 203 illegal and void.  In that same act, Governor Brewer directed ADHS not to accept dispensary applications.  Governor Brewer’s [...]

Read the full article →

Can Dispensary Agents Be Independent Contractors?

July 20, 2011

This is a reprint of the article I authored that was published in the June 2011 issue of the Green leaf magazine: Arizona’s Medical Marijuana Act has a flaw that has the potential to make dispensary operation significantly more expensive than presently assumed.  Specifically, the Act omits “independent contractor” from the definition of who may [...]

Read the full article →

Most of The 357 Bills Passed in Arizona During the 2011 Legislative Session Take Effect July 20, 2011

June 29, 2011

The 2011 Regular Legislative Session adjourned on Wednesday, April 20, 2011 after 100 days.  During that time, 1,350 bills were introduced along with 146 memorials and resolutions.  Although 386 bills passed, 29 were vetoed for a total of 357 bills enacted. Most of these bills will take effect on July 20, 2011. The Arizona Constitution states that [...]

Read the full article →

City of Phoenix Requires Use Permit for Medical Marijuana Operations

May 25, 2011

While the populace voted to legalize the use of medical marijuana in Arizona, and the creation of dispensaries and cultivation sites to provide medical marijuana to such authorized users, the implementation of this new law has been left to the Arizona Department of Health Services (AZDHS) and to Cities and Counties throughout the state.  AZDHS has [...]

Read the full article →